FP’s reading of the Bright Red Farm arrays pearl in Artificer’s campaign strays from base game’s definition of the big problem, as well as the reasoning behind iterators inability to ascend.
"While your chains are made of your own natural urges, mine are a duty to my creators. My kind are built unable to ascend, as our minds are not our own. Composed of microbial life, machinery, and electronics."
Here, Iterators inability to ascend is attributed to iterators being partly inorganic, while in contrast, basegame established that:
"Do you know what a purposed organism is? Actually you are talking to one right now! "Although, a small fraction of one. Nowadays I am mostly just my puppet. The bulk of me is in these walls but I am disconnected from those parts, to a degree where I am only vaguely aware of how bad their condition is."
"It's an instruction on how to circumvent the self-destruction taboo.
The problem with breaking taboos is that the barriers are encoded into every cell of our organic parts. And there are other taboos strictly regulating our ability to rewrite our own genome."
In basegame, inorganic matter was also considered a part of the cycles, and was included within the Benefactor’s definition of the Big Problem, which was to ascend the entire world itself.
likely stems from misreading the info within the parentheses of the exterior base game Pearl to be talking about FP rather than the world.
"As an Iterator, he is also a Gift of Charity from Us to The World (unable to reach Enlightenment by itself - being composed mostly of Rock, Gas, dull witted Bugs and Microbes - and towards which We thus have Obligations)."
Extra note: Scavengers utilise a system of social memory in conjunction with reputation, with social memory being individual Scavengers' opinion of you in contrast to regional reputation. As it gets cleared out on each respawn, this 2837 Scavenger does not actually remember anything pre-death, therefore keeping the integrity of the cycle being intuitive rather than observable knowledge. Of course, unprovability of the cycle's nature is still contradicted by this